Prediction of Zack Fleishman vs Paul Capdeville Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
Z. Fleishman vs P. Capdeville

Zack Fleishman

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

127

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$100.3K

Career Money

$467.5K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Paul Capdeville

CHI

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

127

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$100.3K

Career Money

$467.5K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fleishman 1 - 1 Capdeville

They have played 4 sets in total, with Zack Fleishman winning 2 and Paul Capdeville winning 2. The last match between Paul Capdeville and Zack Fleishman was at the The Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas, 25-02-2007, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Paul Capdeville getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fleishman	1
Capdeville	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(Q2) The Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas(02-25-07)

Stats

Paul Capdeville

Zack Fleishman

(R1) USTA Challenger - Champaign(11-13-06)

Stats

Zack Fleishman

Paul Capdeville

Z. Fleishman vs P. Capdeville H2H Profile

Z. Fleishman	Stats	P. Capdeville
$100,345	Career Prize Money	$467,483
51.99% (222-205)	Career Total W/L	56.47% (393-303)
0	Hard	1
1	Indoor	0
3	Titles	10
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

Z. Fleishman vs P. Capdeville Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zack Fleishman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Paul Capdeville has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zack Fleishman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Capdeville has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Zack Fleishman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Capdeville has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Zack Fleishman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Paul Capdeville winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Zack Fleishman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 14/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 21/25). Paul Capdeville has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 137/95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/15).
Player level: In the last year, Zack Fleishman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Paul Capdeville has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Zack Fleishman winning 1 times and Paul Capdeville being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Zack Fleishman winning 2 and Paul Capdeville winning 2.
The last match between Zack Fleishman and Paul Capdeville was at the The Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas, 25-02-2007, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Paul Capdeville getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zack Fleishman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Paul Capdeville has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zack Fleishman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Capdeville has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Zack Fleishman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Capdeville has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Zack Fleishman vs Paul Capdeville Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

Z. Fleishman vs P. Capdeville H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Z. Fleishman	Stats	P. Capdeville
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
17	Games Won	14
7	Aces (Total)	9
1	Total Double Faults	1
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
52% (30/58)	1st Serve %	62% (33/53)
60% (18/30)	1st Serve Win %	85% (28/33)
68% (19/28)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (10/20)
0% (0/2)	Break Pts Won %	60% (3/5)
28% (15/53)	Return Points Win %	36% (21/58)
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

Z. Fleishman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - New York - 29-08-2011
Q1 Vincent MillotV. Millot	L	4-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
Rogers Cup - Montreal - 08-08-2011
Q1 Alejandro FallaA. Falla	L	6-7(2) 6-2 6-2	Stats
Farmers Classic - Los Angeles - 25-07-2011
Q1 Sahr Timothy KpulunS. Timothy	L	6-2 3-1 ret.	Stats
Wimbledon - London - 20-06-2011
Q1 Marc GicquelM. Gicquel	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 31-08-2009
Q1 Mikhail KukushkinM. Kukushkin	L	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Capdeville Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Santiago Challenger - 14-04-2014
R2 James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-7(5) 6-3 6-4	Stats
R1 Guillermo NunezG. Nunez	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
Barranquilla Challenger - 24-03-2014
R1 Adrian UngurA. Ungur	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Panama City Challenger - 17-03-2014
R1 Guido AndreozziG. Andreozzi	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Australian Open - Melbourne - 13-01-2014
Q2 Taro DanielT. Daniel	L	6-0 6-4	Stats

View All

Z. Fleishman vs P. Capdeville Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Z. Fleishman	Stats	P. Capdeville
51.99% (222/205)	YTD Win/Loss	56.47% (393/303)
50.89% (513/495)	Sets Win/Loss	54.91% (923/758)
50.47% (4898/4807)	Games Win/Loss	51.68% (8157/7627)
52.61% (151/136)	Hard Win/Loss	59.05% (137/95)
45.65% (21/25)	Clay Win/Loss	57.28% (236/176)
51.43% (36/34)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.33% (13/17)
58.33% (14/10)	Grass Win/Loss	31.82% (7/15)
0.04	Aces Per Game	0.18
209	Aces Total	1354
0.03	Double Faults Per Game	0.13
136	Total Double Faults	979
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
486.66	Average Opponent Rank	600.59
54% (1576/2919)	1st Serve %	61% (15950/26099)
69% (1092/1576)	1st Serve Win %	68% (10875/15950)
49% (662/1343)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (4995/10154)
43% (91/214)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (1090/2614)
36% (998/2795)	Return Points Win %	40% (10444/26327)
43.59% (17/22)	Slam W/L	55.56% (40/32)
28.57% (2/5)	Masters W/L	50.00% (18/18)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	47.83% (11/12)
53.16% (42/37)	Main Tour W/L	48.94% (69/72)
51.36% (132/125)	Challenger W/L	59.80% (244/164)
64.44% (29/16)	Futures W/L	68.75% (11/5)
52% (214/413)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (374/648)
50% (4/8)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	38% (15/39)
49% (81/166)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	48% (101/210)
54% (80/149)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (126/243)
85% (216/183)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (394/327)
15% (216/32)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (394/67)
18% (210/37)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (301/65)